Welcome
Welcome to refracta

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. In addition, registered members also see less advertisements. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!

Refracta wiki project

Refracta Development, Scripts, etc.

Re: Refracta wiki project

Postby nadir » Wed Sep 04, 2013 6:32 pm

"A child of three coould solve that problem"
"Quick, someone run for a child of three"
MarxBrothers
So i herd u liek mudkip?
User avatar
nadir
 
Posts: 1160
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:18 am
Location: here

Re: Refracta wiki project

Postby golinux » Wed Sep 04, 2013 6:36 pm

Yes, easy to solve but not for someone who doesn't want to register at Wikipedia. ;)

You want to take a crack at it?
May the FORK be with you!
User avatar
golinux
 
Posts: 663
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Refracta wiki project

Postby nadir » Wed Sep 04, 2013 7:08 pm

Puh, to be honest: not really. If doing that syntax i get headaches.
Let me pull it around my head (though it's of those things where i think: "pull it round the head" in the hope to forget until someone else does it).
I am sure someone at antix takes care of that (for antix, duh) and i thinking asking for their help is a good option.
I am very lazy these days and often just browse the web. Let me look at the links you gave above.

dbbo is good with wiki syntax. I will send a request for help at twitter (another good option) -as long fsmithred is fine with it (which i assume, as long he won't intervene in the following say 48 hours).
So i herd u liek mudkip?
User avatar
nadir
 
Posts: 1160
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:18 am
Location: here

Re: Refracta wiki project

Postby thwak » Sun Sep 08, 2013 6:55 am

[quote="golinux"]Refracta should at least be included on these two pages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison ... tributions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian_family#Debian-based

Creating an entry specifically for Refracta would be a bit more complicated but most of the content was worked out at the beginning of the thread.
I do hope someone will take it on.

Those wikipedia pages are far from being comprehensive.
Same goes for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Li ... tributions which only shows 48 "Debian derivatives"

In contrast, the search results list at distrowatch shows 66
(params: active, based on Debian, not based on Ubuntu)
http://distrowatch.com/search.php?ostyp ... tus=Active
and even that list is STILL incomplete (at least a dozen are stalled on the "distrowatch waiting list")
BTW, what the heck criteria does DW consider when describing a distro as "active"?
I think their criteria needs to be more strict & that their db should be culled.

Anyhow, if you signup and edit at wikipedia, brace yourself for finding a whole lotta politics/********.
Edit something...
...seconds later (literally)(must be bots scripted to watch given pages)
you might find your painstakingly-crafted edit reverted, for no good reason.
So, messing with wikipedia isn't worth the aggravation, in my opinion.
thwak
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 3:58 am

Re: Refracta wiki project

Postby golinux » Sun Sep 08, 2013 3:29 pm

So I guess you won't be volunteering to do it!
May the FORK be with you!
User avatar
golinux
 
Posts: 663
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Refracta wiki project

Postby fsmithred » Tue Apr 08, 2014 1:05 pm

Thanks to jamison over at fdn, refracta2usb is now listed on this page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_t ... SB_systems

Anyone know if it works on Debian kFreeBSD?
User avatar
fsmithred
 
Posts: 2101
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:13 pm

Re: Refracta wiki project

Postby golinux » Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:41 pm

Congrats! But it took me a while to find the listing because it's the last one in the list and not in alphabetical order. There should be a way to fix that . . .

Wish someone would do a Refracta entry on the Linux OS page.
May the FORK be with you!
User avatar
golinux
 
Posts: 663
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Refracta wiki project

Postby fsmithred » Tue Apr 08, 2014 5:37 pm

I think the refracta lines just need to be moved up. But I don't really know. Anyone can edit. I already made a couple minor edits, but I didn't move anything. Maybe when I have more time and I feel brave. Or maybe you'll beat me to it?
User avatar
fsmithred
 
Posts: 2101
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:13 pm

Re: Refracta wiki project

Postby golinux » Tue Apr 08, 2014 6:36 pm

I don't have an account at Wikipedia (and don't want to have one). ;)
May the FORK be with you!
User avatar
golinux
 
Posts: 663
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Refracta wiki project

Postby fsmithred » Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:35 pm

We are alphabetical.
User avatar
fsmithred
 
Posts: 2101
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:13 pm

Previous

Return to Discuss

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron
suspicion-preferred