Welcome
Welcome to refracta

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. In addition, registered members also see less advertisements. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!

Browser Brave

Ask your questions here.

Browser Brave

Postby handygeek » Fri Dec 30, 2016 4:06 pm

Has anyone tested the Mozilla spin-off browser "Brave"?

It appears that it should be compatible:

https://www.brave.com/downloads.html

I'm checking-off hardware & apps before I make the leap ...

Thanks! David
handygeek
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2016 12:31 am

Re: Browser Brave

Postby mrneilypops » Fri Dec 30, 2016 5:08 pm

thanks for the tip...giving it a test run now...
mrneilypops
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 6:20 pm

Re: Browser Brave

Postby golinux » Fri Dec 30, 2016 5:15 pm

Doesn't AdBlock already do that? I NEVER see an ad, not ever. My concern would be the compatibility of addons and customizations. If they are working off the latest FF, it would be a bust for me because of the deprecation of xul and requiring pulse audio etc.
May the FORK be with you!
User avatar
golinux
 
Posts: 663
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Browser Brave

Postby thwak » Fri Dec 30, 2016 9:55 pm

"any plans for enabling easy addons like Chrome or Firefox?"
https://github.com/brave/browser-laptop/issues/253

No, the webextensions are Mozilla's effort to support Chrome extensions, but we will not support FF only extensions
https://brave.com/FAQ.html

7. Why build a browser and not extensions for top browsers?

Extensions face API and performance limits. Our own browser lets us put our best foot forward on speed and deep integration of private ad-tech.
We may do extensions if our users find themselves browsing in other browsers often.
yep, echoing what golinux said -- for me, Brave is a non-starter
thwak
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 3:58 am

Re: Browser Brave

Postby handygeek » Sat Dec 31, 2016 1:45 am

Wait. I'm confused.
golinux said latest FF is bad, Brave is saying FF only is bad, but you are saying the absence of FF is a problem?
Can you share for what browser activities the absence of FF-only extensions is problematic, please?
Things have become so complicated (I thought HTML5 was going to simplify things) that it's hard to keep up with all of the proprietary stuff.
Thanks! David
handygeek
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2016 12:31 am

Re: Browser Brave

Postby golinux » Sat Dec 31, 2016 3:50 am

I've been using firefox since it was firebird (which had to be rebranded). I have learned how to customize it over the years and rely on certain extensions to create a workable environment. Up to FF38.3.0, I am still able to kill tabbed browsing. With Tiny Menu I can move the URL field up to the to menubar as well as some apps including a bookmarks sidebar icon, sessions etc.. I can move browser functions anywhere I want them - no lock in. I also have a status bar at the bottom with more apps. Between AdBlock and Stylish, sites I visit regularly look how I want them to look. A while back dev1fanboy and I started to collect FF extensions on devuan gitlab as an archive for future reference when Mozilla deletes them.

But unfortunately, FF may not be usable for much longer. Chrome doesn't cut it. And Palemoon is limited by the age of it's base though I do use it sometime. Quite frankly, I don't see the point of this sns called 'Brave'.
May the FORK be with you!
User avatar
golinux
 
Posts: 663
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Browser Brave

Postby handygeek » Sat Dec 31, 2016 2:14 pm

Since Brave is still in Beta perhaps sharing what you'd like to see them offer - that makes FF, Chrome, & Palemoon not long-term solutions might result in a Browser you like?
I like that Brave is no locked-into the FF & Chrome models.
I like that Brave is offering an alternative to the ads or ad-blocker mess (some sites are now refusing to display content if ad blocker is enabled).
I like to encourage innovation versus monopoly (less liberty) and Brave looks like an effort at innovation (which is the same reason that I'm looking at refracta).
handygeek
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2016 12:31 am

Re: Browser Brave

Postby golinux » Sat Dec 31, 2016 3:29 pm

Fair 'nuf. But I'll probably wait until it's developed a bit more. Right now I'm not really connecting with what they're saying.
May the FORK be with you!
User avatar
golinux
 
Posts: 663
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Browser Brave

Postby golinux » Sat Dec 31, 2016 6:59 pm

Just revisited the Brave site. This page describes why it's unlikely I will ever use this browser. A 'clean ad' is still an ad. I don't want to see ANY ads. Period. Or overlay/popout invitations etc. I nuke them all.
May the FORK be with you!
User avatar
golinux
 
Posts: 663
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 1:23 am


Return to Help

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron
suspicion-preferred